Il linguaggio rituale gregoriano

  • Sebastiano Sitta

Abstract

Although plainchant has always been classified among musical forms, it has some characteristics that make it a complex language. It is known that, during Antiquity, Latin had a sort of melodic pronunciation that depended on prosodic elements such as the position of tonic accents and the syllabic quantity. The fact can be recognized both in the Classical and in the Late Antiquity. So it was a common idea that music and rhetoric were tightly connected. With the advent of Christianity the role of words gained more and more importance, since they were tied to the Word, identified with Christ, that represents an ideal model for the creatural world. Plainchant increases the musical characteristics of the ritual words and expands their semantic role in the phrase. It can be observed that certain forms of musical emphasis correspond to the words that have the highest semantic weight in that context. Thus plainchant is not only a musical form but also a semantic-weighted markup language, that is a complex ritual language in which phonology, semantic and rituality are expressed in an artistic form.

References

APEL, Willi (1958), Gregorian Chant, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

ASENSIO, Juan Carlos (2003), El canto gregoriano: Historia, Liturgia, Formas, Alianza Editorial, Madrid.

BAROFFIO, Giacomo (2005), «Musica e partecipazione nella liturgia», in Notizie Organistiche, a. 2005, n. 1.

CATTIN, Giulio (1993), La monodia nel medioevo, EDT, Torino.

CATTIN, Giulio (1995), «Secundare e succinere. Polifonia a Padova e Pistoia nel Duecento», in Musica e Storia, n. 3 (1995), pp. 41-

CRESCIMANNO, Claudio (2009), La riforma della riforma liturgica. Ipotesi per un “nuovo” rito della messa sulle tracce del pensiero di Joseph Ratzinger, Fede & Cultura, Verona.

FERRETTI, Paolo Maria (1934), Estetica gregoriana, Pontificio Istituto di Musica Sacra, Roma.

GOZZI, Marco (2013), «In laude confitentis est praedicatio, in cantico amantis affectio: la preghiera raddoppiata del gregoriano», in Fogli Campostrini, n. 1 (2013), vol. 5, pp. 216-240.

GREGUR, Josip (2005), Culmen et fons: Liturgie als actio der Kirche im Spannungsfeld von Symbol und Metapher, Don Bosco, München.

HILEY, David (1993), Western Plainchant: a Handbook, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

LATTANZI, Massimo (1992), Il canto gregoriano non è canto: appunti per un paradosso, in JOPPICH, Godehard, KLÖCKNER, Stefan, a cura di, Cantando praedicare, Bosse, Regensburg, pp. 109-119.

LE GUÉLLO, Jean Baptiste (1924), Il canto gregoriano nella liturgia, Carrara, Bergamo.

LEONE, Giovanni (1924), Grammatica di canto gregoriano, Bardi, Roma

MAJER, Andrea (1821), Discorso sulla origine progressi e stato attuale della musica italiana, Tipografia e fonderia della Minerva, Padova.

MAZZOLINI, Marco (2010), «Istituzioni ritmiche e fine del tempo. Modo e neuma nel canto gregoriano e in Olivier Messiaen», in Doctor Virtualis, n. 10 (2010), pp. 177-191.

RAMPI, Fulvio, LATTANZI, Massimo (1991), Manuale di canto gregoriano, Turris SC [Constitutio de Sacra Liturgia Sacrosanctum Concilium], 4 dicembre 1963.

TURCO, Alberto (1991), Il canto gregoriano. Corso fondamentale, Torre d’Orfeo, Roma.

WARD, Koral (2008), Augenblick: The Concept of the ‘Decisive Moment’ in 19th- and 20thCentury Western Philosophy, Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot.

Published
2014-09-30
How to Cite
Sitta, S. (2014) “Il linguaggio rituale gregoriano”, Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio, 00. Available at: http://160.97.104.70/index.php/rifl/article/view/215 (Accessed: 4December2024).
Section
Sezione 3. Linguaggio e rito