Entre théorie et pratique. Aristote et le strabisme de la techne
Abstract
The Aristotelian reflection on the epistemological status of techne, and more specifically on the definition of rhetoric as a techne, can help us to rethink the very actual cleavage between theory and practice. A good techne, as the rhetoric has to be according to Aristotle, has not to choose between theory and practice, between the universal and the particular, but should be able to look simultaneously in both directions and to keep them together. We will try to show that may be worth to rediscover and to introduce the Aristotelian notion of techne into the contemporary epistemological and philosophical debate.
References
AUBENQUE, Pierre (2004) [1963], La prudence chez Aristote, Paris, PUF.
CAMBIANO, Giuseppe (2009), «La preistoria del concetto di empeiria tra medicina e filosofia», dans Humana.Mente, n. 9, 2012, pp. 87-103.
DI PIAZZA, Salvatore (2011), Congetture e approssimazioni. Forme del sapere in Aristotele, Milano, Mimesis.
GOYET, Francis (2009), Les Audaces de la prudence. Littérature et politique aux XVIe et XVIIe siècles, Paris, Classiques Garnier.
ISNARDI PARENTE, Margherita (1966), Techne. Momenti del pensiero Greco da Platone a Epicuro, Firenze, La Nuova Italia.
JUDSON, Lindsay (1991), Chance and ‘Always For the Most Part’ in Aristotle, dans L. Judson (éd.), Aristotle’s Physics: A collection of Essays, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1991, p.73-100.
KINNEAVY, James L. et ESKIN (2000), Catherine R., « Kairos in Aristotle’s Rhetoric », dans Written Communication, vol. 17, n° 3, 2000, pp. 432-444.
MIGNUCCI, Mario (1981), « `Hos epi to polu et nécessaire dans la conception aristotélicienne de la science », dans E. BERTI (éd.), Aristotle on Science. The “Posterior Analytics”, Proceedings of the Eight Symposium Aristotelicum Held in Padua from September 7-15 1978, Padova, Antenore, 1981, pp. 173-203.
MOUTSOPOULOS, Evanghelos (1985), « La fonction du kairos selon Aristote », dans Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger, 175, 1985, pp. 223-226.
NATALI, Carlo (1989), La saggezza di Aristotele, Napoli, Bibliopolis.
NICOLAS, Loïc (2011), L’exemple ambigu ou la phronèsis du phronimos, dans V. FERRY, B. SANS & A. TOMA (éd.), Études sur l’exemple. Diversité et identité culturelle en Europe, n°8/2, 2011, pp. 27-48.
TREDE, Monique (1992), Kairos. L’à-propos et l’occasion (le mot et la notion, d’Homère à la fin du IVe siècle avant J.-C.), Paris, Éd. Klincksieck.
VELARDE LOBRAÑA, Julián (1999), « La noción de lo hos epi to polu en la epistemología aristotélica », dans Corona spicea. In memoriam Cristóbal Rodríguez Alonso, Oviedo, Universidad de Oviedo, 1999, pp. 313-328.
VIRNO, Paolo (2005), Motto di spirito e azione innovativa. Per una logica del cambiamento, Torino, Bollati Boringhieri.
Works published in RIFL are released under Creative Commons Licence:Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
