Emotion concepts in a new light

Zoltán  Kövecses

doi:10.4396/SFL2019I7

Zoltán Kövecses

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4396/SFL2019I7

Parole chiave: Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory, Emotion Concepts, Emotion Metaphor, Embodiment, Creativity, Context

Abstract

This paper is an attempt to propose a new view of emotion concepts in cognitive linguistics (for the “old” view, see Kövecses 1986, 1990, 2000). The new view builds on two changes to “standard” conceptual metaphor theory (CMT): the idea of conceptual metaphors as multilevel structures and the addition of a reformulated view of context to CMT (see Kövecses 2020). With the help of these two changes to the theory, we can see emotion concepts as multilevel metaphorical structures that are embedded in a wealth of contextual information. The new view also enables us to explain the embodiment of emotion concepts better and allows us to account for the creativity of emotion metaphors.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Altarriba, J., & Bauer, L. M. (2004), «The distinctiveness of emotion concepts: A comparison between emotion, abstract, and concrete words», in The American Journal of Psychology, 117, pp. 389-410. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4149007

Barcelona, Antonio (2000), On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor, in A. Barcelona (ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 32-58.

Borghi, A. M., Binkofski, F., Castelfranchi, C., Cimatti, F., Scorolli, C., & Tummolini, L. (2017), «The Challenge of Abstract Concepts», in Psychological Bulletin, Advance online publication, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/bul0000089 (2017, January 16).

Cameron, L. (2003), Metaphor in educational discourse, Continuum, London.

Deignan, A. (2005), Metaphor and corpus linguistics, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

Edwards, D. (1999), «Emotion Discourse», in Culture & Psychology, Vol. 5(3), pp. 271-291.

Fauconnier, G. and M. Turner (2002), The Way We Think, Basic Books, New York.

Gibbs, R. W. (1994), The poetics of mind, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Gibbs, R. W. (2006), Embodiment and cognitive Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Goatly, 1997; Goatly, Andrew (1997), The language of metaphors, Routledge, London.

Johnson, M. (1987), The body in the mind, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Kövecses, Z. (1986), Metaphors of anger, pride and love. A lexical approach to the structure of concepts, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia.

Kövecses, Z. (1988), The language of love. The semantics of passion in conversational English, Bucknell University Press, Lewisburg PA, Associated University Presses, London and Toronto.

Kövecses, Z. (1990), Emotion concepts, Springer-Verlag, Berlin and New York.

Kövecses, Z. (2000), Metaphor and emotion, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Kövecses, Z. (2002/2010), Metaphor. A practical introduction, Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York.

Kövecses, Z. (2005), Metaphor in culture. Universality and variation. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kövecses, Z. (2008), Metaphor and emotion, in R. Gibbs (ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 380-396.

Kövecses, Z. (2015), Where metaphors come from, Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York.

Kövecses, Z. (2017), «Levels of metaphor», in Cognitive Linguistics, n. 28(2), pp. 321-347.

Kövecses, Z. and G. Radden (1998), «Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view», in Cognitive Linguistics, 9(7), pp. 37-77.

Kövecses, Z. (2020), Extended conceptual metaphor theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Lakoff, G. (1987), Women, fire, and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson (1980), Metaphors we live by, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Lakoff, G. and Z. Kövecses (1987), The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English, in D. Holland and N. Quinn (eds.) Cultural models in language and thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, pp. 195-221.

Langacker, R. (1987), Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites, Stanford University Press, Stanford.

Radden, G. (2002), How metonymic are metaphors?, in Dirven, R. and R. Pörings (eds.). Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin-New York, pp. 407-433.

Rosch, E. (1978), Principles of categorization, in E. Rosch and B.B. Lloyd (eds.), Cognition and categorization, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 27-48.

Semino, E. (2008), Metaphor and discourse, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Steen, Gerard (2008), «The paradox of metaphor. Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor», in Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), pp. 213-241.

Talmy, L. (1988), «Force dynamics in language and cognition», in Cognitive Science, 12, pp. 49-100.

Turner, M. and G. Fauconnier (2000), Metaphor, metonymy, and binding, in Antonio Barcelona (ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 133-145.