Pensiero e azione: l’habit peirceano fra enattivismo e cognizione distribuita

  • Margherita Murgiano

Abstract

The proposal of this paper is to show how the pragmatist approach to meaning developed by Pearce reveals important relations with some central trends of contemporary cognitive science. These theories, like Peircean philosophy, detach themselves from the dualistic idea of a completely inner thought, conceiving external expressions as authentic part of the cognitive system. In order to argue this, I will show how: i) the concept of belief, whose aim is to produce a readiness to act, presents interesting parallels with the enactivist conception of habit, interpreted as an immediate “know-how”; ii) the notion of habit, arising from a cultural and social dimension, puts Peircean  cognitive semiotics in contact with those theories that conceive cognition as a distributed activity; i.e. situated both pragmatically and within a social and cultural environment. Assuming these reference points, I will show how Peircean pragmatism represents an interesting theoretical background of the current needs to reconfigure the role of action, its products and its context of realization.

References

ALAC, Morana, HUTCHINS, Edwin (2004), «I See What You are Saying: Action as Cognition in fMRI Brain Mapping Practice», in Journal of Cognition and Culture, 4(3), pp. 629-661.

CARNAP, Rudolf (1936), «Testability and Meaning», in Philosophy of science, III (1936), pp. 420-471 e IV (1937), pp. 2-40 («Controllabilità e significato», in MEOTTI, Alberto, MONDADORI, Marco, (a cura), Analiticità, significanza, induzione, Il Mulino, Bologna 1971, pp. 149-261).

CLARK, Andy (2008), Supersizing the Mind, Oxford University Press, Oxford-New York.

FABBRICHESI, Rossella (2014), Peirce e Wittgenstein: un incontro. Immagine, prassi, credenza, Mimesis Edizioni, Milano.

FADDA, Emanuele (2013), Peirce, Carocci, Roma.

GALLAGHER, Shaun (2010), «Philosophical Antecedents of Situated Cognition», in ROBBINS, Philip, AYDEDE, Murat (a cura), Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 35-52.

HUTCHINS, Edwin (1995), Cognition in the Wild, MIT Press, Cambrige (MA).

LANFREDINI, Roberta (2011), Qualia e sensazioni: Merleau-Ponty e la nozione di esperienza, in LANFREDINI Roberta (a cura), Divenire in Merleau-Ponty. Filosofia di un soggetto incarnato, Guerini e Associati, Milano, pp. 69-86.

MATURANA, Humberto, VARELA, Francisco (1980), Autopoiesis and Cognition. The Realization of the Living, Reidel Publishing, Dordrecth.

MENARY, Richard (2011), Our Glassy Essence. The Fallible Self in Pragmatist Thought, in GALLAGHER Shaun (a cura), The Oxford Handbook of the Self, OUP, Oxford, pp. 609-632.

MERLEAU-PONTY, Maurice (1945), Phénoménologie de la perception, Paris, Gallimard.

NOË, Alva (2004), Action in Perception, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).

NOË, Alva (2009), Out of our Heads. Why You Are Not Your Brain, and Other Lessons from The Biology of Consciousnes, Hill and Wang, New York.

O’REGAN, J. Kevin, NOË, Alva (2001a), «A Sensorimotor Account of Vision and Visual Consciousness», in Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), pp. 939-973.

PAOLUCCI, Claudio (2011), «The “External Mind”: Semiotics, Pragmatism, Extended Mind and Distributed Cognition», in Versus, Quaderni di studi semiotici, 112-113, pp. 69-96.

PEIRCE, Charles Sanders (1931-1958), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, voll. I-VI, Hartshorne C., Weiss P. (eds.) 1931-1935, voll. VII-VIII Burks A. W. (ed.) 1958, Belknap Press, , Cambridge (MA), (Opere, in Massimo A., Bonfantini (a cura), Bompiani, Milano, 2003).

ROWLANDS, Mark (2010), The New Science of Mind. From Extended Mind to Embodied Phenomenology, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA)-London.

TORRANCE, Steve (2006), «In search of the enactive: Introduction to special issue on enactive experience», in Phenomenology and Cognitive Science, 4(4), pp. 357-368.

VARELA, Francisco, THOMPSON, Evan, ROSCH, Eleanor (1991), The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).

Published
2015-09-29
How to Cite
Murgiano, M. (2015) “Pensiero e azione: l’habit peirceano fra enattivismo e cognizione distribuita”, Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio, 0(2). Available at: http://160.97.104.70/index.php/rifl/article/view/305 (Accessed: 28December2024).