Acknowledging the Human: The Experience with Performance and the Application of the Concept of "Art"
Abstract
In this article, I propose some reasons to explain the relationship between experience with performances and the difficulties in applying the concepts of ‘work of art’ and ‘art’ to them. The hypothesis I formulate is that the performances are works of art that, by causing interferences in the conceptual application, encourage an imaginative activity that projects human limits and possibilities – including those in the use of concepts. This would happen because in the experience with the performances we are influenced by a sort of ‘aesthetic reflexivity’: namely, acknowledging the human – since we are human beings – we are not always able to appeal to the right concepts.
References
Auslander, Philip (2018) Reactivations: Essays on Performance and Its Documentation, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
Cavell, Stanley (1979), The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality, and Tragedy, Oxford University Press, Oxford (La riscoperta dell’ordinario. La filosofia, lo scetticismo, il tragico, trad. it. di B. Agnese, con postfazione di D. Sparti, Carocci, Roma 2001).
Corris, Michael, (ed.) (2004), Conceptual Art: Theory, Myth, and Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Dal Sasso, Davide (2020), Nel segno dell’essenziale. L’arte dopo il concettualismo, Rosenberg & Sellier, Torino.
Davies, David (2004), Art as Performance, Wiley Blackwell, Oxford.
Diamond, Cora (1988), «Losing your Concepts», in Ethics, n. 98 (2), pp. 255-277 (Perdere i propri concetti, trad. it. di M. Falomi, in L’immaginazione e la vita morale, ed. it. a cura di P. Donatelli, Carocci, Roma 2006, pp. 59-86).
Formaggio, Dino (1973), L’arte, Mondadori, Milano, nuova edizione, 1981.
Gallagher, Shaun (2021), Performance/Art: The Venetian Lectures, edited by C. Vara Sánchez, Mimesis International, Milano.
Goldberg, RoseLee (1979), Performance Art: From Futurism to the Present, Thames and Hudson, London, third edition, 2011.
Goldstein, Ann and Rorimer, Anne (eds) (1995), Reconsidering the Object of Art: 1965-1975,
The MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).
Lalumera, Elisabetta (2009), Che cosa sono i concetti, Laterza, Roma-Bari.
Lippard, Lucy and Chandler, John (1968), «The Dematerialization of Art», in Changing: Essays in Art Criticism, Dutton and co., New York 1971.
Matteucci, Giovanni (2019), Estetica e natura umana. La mente estesa tra percezione, emozione ed espressione, Carocci, Roma.
Millikan, Ruth Garreth (2000) On Clear and Confused Ideas. An Essay about Substance Concepts, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (Delle idee chiare e confuse. Saggio sui concetti di sostanza, ed. it a cura di C. Marletti, trad. it. di V. Zavarella, ETS, Pisa 2003).
Phelan, Peggy (1993), Umarked: The Politics of Performance, Routledge, London-New York.
Rorimer, Anne (2004), New Art in the 60s and 70s: Redefining Reality, Thames and Hudson, London.
Schechner, Richard (2003), Performance Theory, Routledge, New York-London.
Schechner, Richard (2020), Performance Studies: An Introduction, Fourth Edition, Routledge, New York.
Smith, Roberta (1999), «Conceptual Art: Over, And Yet Everywhere», in The New York
Times; 25/04/1999; disponibile online:
https://www.nytimes.com/1999/04/25/arts/art-architecture-conceptual-art-over-and-yet-everywhere.html
Walton, Kendall L. (1990), Mimesis as Make Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (MA) (Mimesi come far finta. Sui fondamenti delle arti rappresentazionali, ed. it. a cura di M. Nani, Mimesis, Milano-Udine 2011).
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1967), Zettel, edited by G.E.M. Anscombe & G.H. von Wright, Second edition, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles 1981 (Zettel. Lo spazio segregato della psicologia, ed. it. a cura di M. Trinchero, Torino, Einaudi, 1986).
Works published in RIFL are released under Creative Commons Licence:Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
