Why Kant is not a Meinongian

  • Giovanni Mion
Keywords: Kant, existence, existential quantifier, Russell, Meinong

Abstract

In this article, I will not only attempt to defend the Kantian position regarding existence from a series of recent criticisms from some analytic philosophers, but I will also try to demonstrate that, to effectively respond to such criticisms, one must resort to the analytic tradition itself and in particular, to the Fregean idea that existence is a quantifier.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Berto, Francesco (2010), L’esistenza non è logica: Dal quadrato rotondo ai mondi impossibili, Laterza, Roma-Bari.

Bonevac, Daniel (1982), «Kant on existence and modality», in Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, vol. 64, n. 3, pp. 290-300.

Bonomi, Andrea (1979), Universi di discorso, Feltrinelli, Milano.

D’Agostini, Franca (2012), «Kant era noneista?», inParadigmi. Rivista di critica filosofica, 1, pp. 91-109.

Everitt, Nicholas (2004), The Non-Existence of God, Routledge, London.

Findlay, John Niemeyer (1981), Kant and the Transcendental Object. A Hermeneutic Study, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Kant, Immanuel (1763), L’unico argomento possibile per una dimostrazione dell’esistenza di Dio in Scritti precritici, Bari-Roma, Laterza, 1990.

Kant, Immanuel (1781/1787), Critica della ragion pura, Milano, Bompiani, 2004.

Kripke, Saul (1980), Nome e necessità, Torino, Bollati Boringhieri, 1999.

Longuenesse, Béatrice (2005), Kant on the Human Standpoint, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Mion, Giovanni (2019), «Hintikka on the “Kant-Frege view”: A critical assessment», in Logica Universalis, 13:2, pp. 171-178.

Mion, Giovanni (2018), «On Kant’s hidden ambivalence toward existence in his critique of the ontological argument», in Journal of Applied Logics, 5:7, pp. 1515-1522.

Odifreddi, Piergiorgio (2003), Il diavolo in cattedra, Einaudi, Torino.

Penco, Carlo (1994), Vie della scrittura. Frege e la svolta linguistica, Franco Angeli, Milano.

Penco, Carlo (2010), Frege, Carocci, Roma.

Proops, Ian (2015), «Kant and the Ontological Argument», in Noûs, 49, pp. 1-27.

Quine, Willard Van Orman (1948), «On what there is», in Review of Metaphysics, 48, pp. 21-38. Reprinted in From a Logical Point of View, Harper Row, New York, 1953.

Russell, Bertrand (1905), «On denoting», inMind, 14, pp. 479-493.

Russell, Bertrand (1919), Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy, George Allen & Unwin, London.

Shaffer, Jerome (1962), «Existence, predication and the ontological argument», in Mind, 71, pp. 307-325.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1921), Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Torino, Einaudi, 1964.

Published
2025-02-26
How to Cite
Mion, G. (2025) “Why Kant is not a Meinongian”, Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio, 18(2). doi: 10.4396/20242V02.