Biopolitics or Biolinguistics? On language and human nature (With Some Glosses on Agamben and the “sovereign power”)
Abstract
The thesis of this paper is that “biopolitics” in fact means biolinguistics. More specifically, the thesis is that biopolitics – defined as the grip of political power on the human body and life – is but a consequence of the main biological character of Homo sapiens: language. Politics (economics) and religion are but consequences of the basic anthropological fact that human beings are primarily speaking beings, that is, the animals of language. Therefore, from an anthropological perspective the intrinsically biolinguistic nature of human animals is the ground of biopolitics. Every form of dualism (body on one side, psyche, Power, and God on the other) derives from the original dualistic structure of language. In the last part of this paper, an analysis of Agamben’s thought about language will argue in favor of this thesisRiferimenti bibliografici
AGAMBEN, Giorgio (1982), Il linguaggio e la morte, Einaudi, Torino (Language and death. The place of negativity, eng. tr., Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press 1991).
AGAMBEN, Giorgio (1995), Homo sacer. Il potere sovrano e la nuda vita, Einaudi, Torino (Homo sacer. Sovereign Power and Bare Life, eng. tr., Stanford, Stanford University Press 1998).
AGAMBEN, Giorgio (2008), Il sacramento del linguaggio. Archeologia del giura-mento, Laterza, Roma-Bari (The Sacrament of Language. An Archaeology of the Oath, eng. tr., Stanford University Press, Stanford 2011).
AGAMBEN, Giorgio (2014), Il fuoco e il racconto, Nottetempo, Roma.
AGAMBEN, Giorgio (2014), L’uso dei corpi, Neri Pozza, Vicenza (The Use of Bod-ies, eng. tr., Stanford University Press, Stanford 2015).
AGAMBEN, Giorgio (2015a), Pulcinella. Ovvero divertimento per li regazzi, Notte-tempo, Roma.
CHOMSKY, Noam, FOUCAULT, Michel (2006), The Chomsky-Foucault Debate: On Human Nature, The New Press, New York.
CIMATTI, Felice (2000), La scimmia che si parla. Linguaggio, autocoscienza e li-bertà nell’animale umano, Bollati Boringhieri, Torino.
CIMATTI, Felice (2007), Il volto e la parola. Psicologia dell’apparenza, Quodlibet, Macerata.
CIMATTI, Felice (2009), Il possibile e il reale. Il sacro dopo la morte di Dio, Codice, Torino.
CIMATTI, Felice (2013), Filosofia dell’animalità, Laterza, Bari-Roma.
CIMATTI, Felice (2014), «Linguaggio e immanenza. Kierkegaard e Deleuze sul di-venir-animale», in Aut Aut, 363, pp. 189-208.
CIMATTI, Felice (2015), Il taglio. Linguaggio e pulsione di morte, Quodlibet, Ma-cerata.
CIMATTI, Felice (2015a), «Una “ferocia psicotica”. Wittgenstein e Lacan», in Il cannocchiale. Rivista di studi filosofici, XL(1), pp. 29-57.
CIMATTI, Felice (2016), «Frankenstein on Language and Becoming (Post)Human», in Ecozon@, 7(1), pp. 10-27.
COVENTRY, Kenny, LYNOTT, Dermot, CANGELOSI, Angelo, MONROUXE, Lynn, JOYCE, Dan, RICHARDSON, Daniel (2010), «Spatial language, visual atten-tion, and perceptual simulation», in Brain and Language, 112(3), pp. 202-213.
DEVANAND, Manoli, MEISSNER, Geoffrey, BAKER Bruce (2006), «Blueprints for behavior: genetic specification of neural circuitry for innate behaviors», in Trends in neurosciences 29(8), pp. 444-451.
ESPOSITO, Roberto (2014), Le persone e le cose, Einaudi, Torino (Persons and Things: From the Body’s Point of View, eng. tr., Cambridge, Polity Press 2015).
FALK, Dean (2004), «Prelinguistic evolution in early hominins: Whence motherese?», in Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(4), pp. 491-503.
FOUCAULT, Michel (1976), Le volonté de savoir, Gallimard, Paris (The History of Sexuality, I, eng. tr., Random House, New York 1978).
GIBSON, James (1966), The senses considered as perceptual systems, Boston, Houghton Mifflin.
JENKINS, Lyle (2000), Biolinguistics: Exploring the Biology of Language, Cam-bridge University Press, New York.
KAYE, Kenneth (1980), «Why we don’t talk ‘baby talk’ to babies», in Journal of Child Language, 7(3), pp. 489-507.
KNOEFERLE Pia, CROCKER Matthew (2006), «The Coordinated Interplay of Scene, Utterance, and World Knowledge: Evidence From Eye Tracking», in Cognitive Science, 30, pp. 481-529.
LO PIPARO, Franco (2004), Aristotele e il linguaggio, Laterza, Roma-Bari.
MISHRA, Ramesh Kumar (2016), Interaction Between Attention and Language Sys-tems in Humans. A Cognitive Science Perspective, Springer, Berlin.
MITCHELL, Robert ed. (2002), Pretending and imagination in animals and children, Cambridge University Press, Boston.
RIZZOLATTI Giacomo, LUPPINO Giuseppe (2001), «The Cortical Motor System», in Neuron, 31(6), pp. 889-901.
SALZANI, Carlo (2015), «Il linguaggio è il sovrano: Agamben e la politica del lin-guaggio», in Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio, 9(1), pp. 268-280.
STOFFREGEN, Thomas (2003), «Affordances as Properties of the Animal-Environment System», in Ecological Psychology, 15(2), pp. 115-134.
TREVARTHEN, Colwyn (2011), «What is it like to be a person who knows noth-ing? Defining the active intersubjective mind of a newborn human being”, Infant and Child Development 20(1), pp. 119-135.
VYGOTSKY, Lev, LURIA, Alexander (1984), Orudie I znak v razvitii rebënka, in Sobranie sočinenij, vol. VI, Pedagogika, Moskva (Tool and Sign in the Development of the Child, in The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky, vol. 6, Kluwer, New York 1987).
XIMENES, Joana Rossello (2016), The centrality of speech for human thought, in Anna Maria Di Sciullo ed., Biolinguistic Investigations on the Language Faculty, Benjamin, Amsterdam, pp. 55-77.
YUSA, Noriaki (2016), Syntax in the brain, in Koji Fujita, Cedric Boeckx eds. Ad-vances in Biolinguistics. The human language faculty and its biological basis, Routledge, London, pp. 141-152.
Quest'opera è distribuita con Licenza Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
