The Importance of Aesthetics for the Evolution of Language

Camilla Robuschi

doi:10.4396/2021211

Camilla Robuschi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4396/2021211

Parole chiave: Biosemiotics, Aesthetics, Language, Modeling System Theory, Code-duality

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate how aesthetics can foster the evolution of language. For this purpose, it is first necessary to define the two terms of research and their ecosystemic function from a broader perspective than that of many authors who, in reasoning about the relationship between aesthetics and language, circumscribe them to their symbolic products. We have therefore adopted the perspective of biosemiotics or, more specifically, the Modeling System Theory by Thomas Sebeok and Marcel Danesi.This allows us to state that aesthetics and language are two modeling systems useful for creating models of the surroundings, and they originate in a typically averbal and iconic modeling system: the Primary Modeling System. Assuming that language and aesthetics are not limited to the verbal symbolic sphere, we can advance the hypothesis that aesthetics is a particular modeling system that allows all living beings to grasp meaningful differences and similarities in the Umwelt, then synthesize them into classificatory connections. However, the outcome of such a system can never be taken for granted and often involves trial and error.In the aesthetics-linguistic relationship, these are the variable and chance elements that may (or may not) allow for the emergence of novelty.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Alexander, Victoria N. (2011), The Biologist's Mistress: Rethinking Self-organization in Art, Literature, and Nature, Emergent Publications, Litchfield Park.

Bateson, Gregory (1972), Steps to an Ecology of Mind, Chandler, San Francisco.

Bateson, Gregory (1979), Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity, E.P. Dutton, New York.

Brentari, Carlo (2015), Jakob von Uexküll: the Discovery of the Umwelt between Biosemiotics and Theoretical Biology, Springer, Dordrecht.

Bruni, Luis Emilio (2007), Cellular Semiotics and Signal Transduction, in Barbieri, Marcello (ed.), Introduction to Biosemitics, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 365-408.

Cowley, Stephen J. (2015), Verbal Patterns: Taming Cognitive Biology, in Velmezova, E., Kull, K. and Cowley, S.J. (eds), Biosemiotic Perspectives on Language and Linguistics, Springer, Cham, pp. 123-148.

Croce, Benedetto (1902), Estetica come scienza dell’espressione e linguistic generale, Sandron, Palermo (Aesthetic: As Science of Expression and General Linguistics, transl. by A. Douglas, Barnes & Noble Digital Library, New York 2011).

Deacon, Terrence W. (1997), The Symbolic Species: The Co-Evolution of Language and the Human Brain, Norton & Company, New York.

Deacon, Terrence W. (2006), The Aesthetic Faculty, in Turner, Mark (ed.), The Artful Mind: Cognitive Science and the Riddle of Human Creativity, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 21-53.

Eco, Umberto (1962), Opera aperta. Forma e indeterminazione nelle poetiche contemporanee, Bompiani, Milano.

Franzini, Elio and Mazzocut-Mis, Maddalena (1996), Estetica. I nomi, i concetti, le correnti, Mondadori, Milano.

Gould, Stephen Jay and Vrba, Elisabeth (1982), «Exaptation: A Missing Term in the Science of Form», in Paleobiology, n. 8, pp. 4-15.

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1835), Vorlesungen über die Ästhetik (Lectures on Aesthetics, eng. trans. By T.M. Knox, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1979).

Hoffmeyer, Jesper (2008), A Legacy for Living Systems: Gregory Bateson as Precursor to Biosemiotics, Springer, Cham.

Hoffmeyer, Jesper (1998), Signs of Meaning in the Universe, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

Hoffmeyer, Jesper and Emmeche, Claus (1991), Code-Duality and the Semiotics of Nature, in Anderson, Myrdene and Merrell, Floyd (eds.), On Semiotic Modeling, Mouton de Gruyter, New York, pp. 117-166.

Hopkins, Gerard Manley (2006), On the Origin of Beauty: a Platonic Dialogue, in Higgins, Lesley (ed.), The Collected Works of Gerard Manley Hopkins. Volume IV, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 136-173.

Humphrey, Nicholas Keynes (1973), «The Illusion of Beauty», in Perception, vol. 2, pp. 429-439.

Lotman, Yuri (1967), «Искусство в рядумоделирующихсистем», in Sign Systems Studies, vol. 3, pp. 130-145 («The Place of Art Among Other Modelling Systems», in Sign Systems Studies, vol. 39, n. 3, , 2011, pp. 249-270).

Lotman, Yuri (1977), «Kul'tura kak intellect i problem iskusstvennogo razuma», in Akademijanauk SSSR, Moskva, pp. 1-18 (Culture as Collective Intellect and the Problems of Artificial Intelligence, transl. by, A. Shukman, Oxford 1979).

Markoš, Anton and Faltýnek, Dan (2011), «Language Metaphors of Life», in Biosemiotics, vol. 4, pp. 171-200.

Morris, Charles and Hamilton, Daniel J. (1965), «Aesthetics, Signs, and Icons», in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 25, n. 3, pp. 356-364.

Plebe, Armando (1965), Estetica, Firenze, Sansoni.

Sebeok, Thomas Albert (1998), «The Estonian connection», in Sign System Studies, vol. 26, pp. 20-41.

Sebeok, Thomas Albert (1962), Animal Communication: Techniques of Study and Results of Research, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

Sebeok, Thomas Albert (1969), «Prefigurements of Art», in Semiotica, vol. 27, n. 1, pp. 3-73.

Sebeok, Thomas Albert (1988) Communication, language and speech: evolutionary considerations, in M. Herzfeld and L. Melazzo (eds), Semiotic Theory and Practice: Proceedings of the Third International Congress of the IASS Palermo, vol. II, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 1083–1091.

Sebeok, Thomas Albert (1991), A Sign Is Just a Sign, Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis.

Sebeok, Thomas Albert and Danesi, Marcel (2000), The Forms of Meaning: Modeling Systems Theory and Semiotic Analysis, De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin and Boston.

Velmezova, Ekaterina, Kull, Kalevi and Cowley, J. Stephen (2015), Biosemiotic Perspectives on Language and Linguistics, Springer, Cham.

Wheeler, Wendy (2014), Natural Play, Natural Metaphor, and Natural Stories: Biosemiotic Realism, in Iovino, Serenella and Opperman, Serpil, Material Ecocriticism, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. 67-79.