I confini del matrimonio: un problema semiotico
Abstract
The subject of this article is a particular kind of constituent discourse - the legal one- in relation to a foundational institution of social life - marriage, which is currently experiencing a lively debate in the light of the types of partnerships becoming more frequent and diverse. I will therefore examine some Italian bills, whose text - analyzed semiotically - highlights how at stake in this debate is an ideological-cultural problem of categorization of the world, not so much and not only an issue of rights and duties to be guaranteed (on which the debate is much more convergent).
References
DE ANGELIS, Rossana (2014), «La notion saussurienne d’institution sociale. Des theories linguistiques à la sémiotique des cultures», D. Ablali, S. Badir, D. Ducard (éds.), F. Rastier. Documents, textes, œuvres. Perspectives Sémiotiques, Publications Universitaires de Rennes, Rennes.
ECO, Umberto (1975), Trattato di semiotica generale, Bompiani, Milano.
ECO, Umberto (1990), I limiti dell’interpretazione, Bompiani, Milano.
ECO, Umberto (1997), Kant e l'ornitorinco, Bompiani, Milano.
FADDA, Emanuele (2004), Lingua e mente sociale. Per una teoria delle istituzioni linguistiche a partire da Saussure e Mead, Bonanno Editore, Roma.
GALLO, Daniele, PALADINI, Luca, PUSTORINO, Pietro (2014), [a cura di] Same-Sex Couples before National, Supranational and International Jurisdictions, Springer, Berlin.
HJELMSLEV, Louis (1943), Prolegomena to a Theory of Language, Regents of the University of Wisconsin (tr.it. di G.C. Lepschy, I fondamenti della teoria del linguaggio. Torino, Einaudi, 1987).
MAINGUENEAU, Dominique, COSSUTTA, Frédéric (1995), «L'analyse des discours constituants», in Langages n. 117, 1995, pp. 112-125.
MARRONE, Gianfranco (2011) Addio alla natura, Einaudi, Torino.
Works published in RIFL are released under Creative Commons Licence:Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
