Deliberation and the Extraordinary: The mobilization of fear and hope in divination and conspiracy theories
Abstract
Divination and conspiracy theories are societal phenomena that share at least two features: they both seek out explanations for a peculiar state of the world and perplex most members of our modern occidental societies. In this paper, we will explore these phenomena through the glance of rhetorical deliberation, with a particular focus on the impact of fear and hope on the process. Doing so, we hope to achieve a better understanding of the deliberative genre, especially for what concerns the role of the emotions of fear and hope in persuasion.
References
Alessi, Flavio Valerio (2021), «Tra credenze, dubbi, rischi e cause. Lo stile interpretativo dell’epidemiologia e del complottismo», in Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio, Special Issue SFL, from: 10.4396/SFL2021A02
Baker, Elton (2006), «Paging the Oracle: Interpretation, Identity, and Performance in Herodotus’ History», in Greece and Rome, 53, pp. 1-28.
Blösel, Wolfgang (2004), Themistokles bei Herodot: Spiegel Athens im fünften Jahrhundert. Studien zue Geschichte und historiographischen Konstruktion des griechischen Freiheitskampfes 480 v. Chr., Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart.
Bronner, Gérald (2013), La démocratie des crédules, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
Butter, Michael, Knight, Peter (2023), Covid conspiracy theories in global perspective, Routledge, London-New York.
Carrière, Jean-Claude (1988), «Oracles et présages de Salamine. Hérodote et Athènes», in Dialogues d’histoire ancienne 14, pp. 219-275.
Cimatti, Felice (2022), Libertà di espressione e ricerca del capro espiatorio, in Di Piazza, Salvatore, a cura di, Spena, Alessandro (2022), Parole cattive. La libertà di espressione tra linguaggio, diritto e filosofia, Macerata, Quodlibet Studio.
Crahay, Roland (1956), La littérature oraculaire chez Hérodote, Les Belles Lettres, Paris.
Dainville, Julie, Donckier de Donceel, Lucie (2021), «Les usages de l’ekphrasis. Introduction», Exercices de rhétorique, 17 from : https://journals.openedition.org/rhetorique/1242
Damasio, Antonio (1994), Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain, Putnam, New York.
Danblon, Emmanuelle (2002), Rhétorique et rationalité. Essai sur l’émergence de la critique et de la persuasion, Éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles, Brussels.
Detienne, Marcel (1967), Les Maîtres de vérité dans la Grèce archaïque, François Maspero, Paris.
Di Cesare, Donatella (2021), Il complotto al potere, Einaudi Edizioni, Torino.
Di Piazza, Salvatore, Piazza Francesca, Serra, Mauro (2018), «Rhetorical deliberation. A sustainable normativism from a Gorgianic-Aristotelian perspective», in Paradigmi, 36,3, from https://dx.doi.org/10.30460/91900
Dominicy, Marc (2010), Les sources cognitives de la théorie du complot. La causalité et les « faits », in Danblon, Emmanuelle, Nicolas, Loic, eds, (2010), Les rhétoriques de la conspiration, CNRS Éditions, Paris.
Evans, J. A. S. (1982), «The Oracle of the ‘Wooden Wall’», in Classical Journal, 78, pp. 24-29.
Evans, J. A. S. (1988), «The ‘Wooden Wall’ Again», Ancient History Bulletin, 2, 2, pp. 25-30.
Flower, Michael A. (2008), The Seer in Ancient Greece, University of California Press, Berkeley-Los Angeles-London.
Freese, John Henri (2020), Aristotle. Art of Rhetoric. Translated by Freese, J. H. Revised by Striker, G., Loeb Classical Library 193, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Giry, Julien, Tika, Pranvera (2020), Conspiracy Theories in Political Science and Political Theory, in Butter, Michael Knight, Peter (2020), The Handbook of Conspiracy Theories, Routledge, London-New York.
Godley, Afred Denis (1920), Herodotus. The Persian Wars, Volume I: Books 1-2. Translated by A. D. Godley. Loeb Classical Library 117Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Hougue, Clémentine (2020), Art du récit, figure et mythologie des fictions et des discours complotistes, in Cetro & Sini (2020), Fake news, rumeurs, intox … Stratégies et visées discursives de la désinformation, L’Harmattan, Paris.
How, Walter & Wells; Joseph (1961 [1928], A Commentary on Herodotus, with Introduction and Appendixes, 2 volumes, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Keeley, Brian L. (1999), «Of conspiracy theories», in The Journal of Philosophy, 96,3, pp. 109-126.
Konstan, David (2006), The Emotions of the Ancient Greeks, University of Toronto Press, Toronto-Buffalo-London.
Liebeschuetz, Wolf (1968), «Thucydides and the Sicilian Expedition», in Historia: Zeitschrift für alte Geschichte, 17, pp. 289-306.
Micheli, Raphaël (2010), L’émotion argumentée. L’abolition de la peine de mort dans le débat parlementaire français, Éditions du Cerf, Paris.
Nicolas, Loic (2014), «L’évidence du complot : un défi à l’argumentation. Douter de tout pour ne plus douter du tout», in Argumentation et Analyse du Discours, 13, from https://doi.org/10.4000/aad.1833
Niedzielzki, Benjamin (2017), «The Complex Depiction of Nicias in Thucydides», in UCLA Historical Journal, 28, pp. 37-50.
Oost, Stewart Irvin (1975), «Thucydides and the Irrational: Sundry Passages», Classical Philology, 70, pp. 186-196.
Perrin, Bernadotte (1916), Plutarch. Lives, Volume III: Pericles and Fabius Maximus. Nicias and Crassus. Translated by Perrin, B. Loeb Classical Library 65., Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Perrin, Bernadotte (1918), Plutarch. Lives, Volume VI: Dion and Brutus. Timoleon and Aemilius Paulus. Translated by Perrin B., Loeb Classical Library 98. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Piazza, Francesca (2021), «Per un approccio retorico alle emozioni. Aristotele Retorica, II, I-II» in Piazza, Francesca, Pugliese, Alice, a cura di, Il prisma delle passioni. Prospettive per un’antropologia delle emozioni, Palermo, Palermo University Press, pp. 7-27.
Plantin, Christian (2011), Pour une approché intégrée du champ de l’argumentation. État de la question et questions controversées, from http://www.icar.cnrs.fr/pageperso/cplantin/documents/7.Ap_Int_11_07.pdf
Robertson, Noel (1987), «The True Meaning of the ‘Wooden Wall’», in Classical Philology, 82, pp. 1-20.
Rood, Tim (2017), «Thucydides, Sicily, and the Defeat of Athens», Ktèma, 42, pp. 19-42.
Sapere, Analía (2016), «Eclipses, razón y superstición en las vidas de Nicias y Dión de Plutarco», Estudios griegos e indoeuropeos, 26, 2016, pp. 179-195.
Smith, Charles F. (1923), Thucydides. History of the Peloponnesian War, Volume IV: Books 7-8. General Index. Translated by C. F. Smith. Loeb Classical Library 169. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Stockley, James (1998), «The Total Solar Eclipses Described by Plutarch», in Histos, 2, pp. 72-82.
Taguieff, Pierre-André (2006), L’imaginaire du complot mondial : aspect d’un mythe moderne, Mille et une nuits, Paris.
Taguieff, Pierre-André (2013), Court traité de complotologie. Suivi de : Le « complot judéo-maçonnique » : fabrication d’un mythe apocalyptique moderne, Fayard, Paris.
Vernant, Jean-Pierre (1974), «Parole et signes muets», in Vernant, Jean-Pierre et al., eds, Divination et rationalité, Seuil, Paris pp. 9-25.
Webb, Ruth (2009), Ekphrasis, Imagination and Persuasion in Ancient Rhetorical Theory and Practice, Routledge, Ashgate 2009.
Webb, Ruth (2007), The Model Ekphraseis of Nikolaos the Sophist as Memory Images, in Grünbart Michael (ed.), Theatron: Rhetorische Kultur in Spätantike und Mittelalter, De Gruyter, Berlin pp. 463-475.
Webb, Ruth (1997), Mémoire et imagination : les limites de l’enargeia dans la théorie rhétorique grecque, in Lévy Carlos & Pernot Laurent, eds, Dire l’évidence (Philosophie et rhétorique antiques), L’Harmattan, Paris pp. 229-248.
Westlake, Henri Dickinson (1941), «Nicias in Thucydides», in Classical Quarterly, 35, pp. 58-65.
Works published in RIFL are released under Creative Commons Licence:Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
