Immagini (per l)e parole. La metafora visiva tra occhio innocente e immaginazione / Pictures and/for Words. Visual Metaphor between Innocent Eye and Imagery
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to give a critical reading of Noël Carroll’s account of visual metaphors. In particular, I have highlighted the possible issues arising from his proposal, focusing on two aspects: 1) homospatiality is not the pictorial equivalent for the ‘is’ of identity that, according to Carroll, can be found in verbal metaphors of the kind «A is B». The ‘is’ of verbal metaphors predicates an intension of the metaphorizing term - that the interpreter is supposed to grasp through the context - and does not suggest identity between A and B; 2) it is hard to sustain that the comprehension of pictorial metaphors relies on a visual perception not mediated by codes. The article ends taking the moves from one of the final considerations advanced by Carroll – namely that a visual metaphor is a device for encouraging imaginative insights – and moves further, trying to sketch out a theory of visual metaphor leveraging the key role of mental images in cognition.References
ALDRICH, Virgil C. (1968), «Visual Metaphor», in Journal of Aesthetic Education, vol. 2, n. 1, pp. 73-86.
BARTHES, Roland (1965), Rhétorique de l’image, in id., L’obvie et l’obtus. Essais critiques III, Paris, Éditions du Seuil (L’ovvio e l’ottuso. Saggi critici III, trad. di vari, Einaudi, Torino 1985, pp. 22-41).
BLACK, Max (1962), Models and Metaphors, Cornell University Press, Ithaca-London (Modelli, archetipi, metafore, trad. di Almansi Annalisa, Paradisi Enrico, Pratiche Editrice, Parma 1983).
BOEHM, Gottfried (1994), Die Wiederkehr der Bilder, in id., a cura di, Was ist ein Bild?, Fink, München, pp. 11-38 (Il ritorno delle immagini, in id., La svolta iconica, trad. di Di Monte Maria Giuseppina, Di Monte Michele, Marrone Stefano, Pastore Elisabetta, Meltemi, Roma 2009, pp. 37-67).
CARROLL, Noël (1994), Visual Metaphor, in id., Beyond Aesthetics: Philosophical Essays, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2001, pp. 347-368.
CARROLL, Noël (1996), Theorizing the Moving Image, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
CARROLL, Noël (2001), «Modernity and the Plasticity of Perception», in The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol. 59, n. 1, pp. 11-17 (La modernità e la plasticità della percezione, in DANTO Arthur C., La storicità dell’occhio. Un dibattito con Noël Carroll e Mark Rollins, trad. e cura di Di Monte Michele, Armando Editore, Roma 2007, pp. 57-77).
CARSTON, Robyn (2010), «Metaphor: Ad Hoc Concepts, Literal Meaning and Mental Images», in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 110, pp. 295-321.
COTHEY, Antony L. (1991), Art and Metaphor, in id., The Nature of Art, Routledge, London, pp. 96-115.
CAVAZZANA, Alessandro (2017), «Il ruolo cognitivo della metafora in Arthur C. Danto», in estetica. studi e ricerche, vol. 7, n. 1, pp. 57-72.
DANTO, Arthur C. (1981), The Transfiguration of the Commonplace. A Philosophy of Art, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass.)-London (La trasfigurazione del banale. Una filosofia dell’arte, trad. di Velotti Stefano, Laterza, Roma-Bari 2010).
DANTO, Arthur C. (1992), Beyond the Brillo Box. The Visual Arts in Post-historical Perspective, University of California Press, Berkeley-Los Angeles (Oltre il Brillo Box. Il mondo dell’arte dopo la fine della storia, trad. di Rotili Manrica, Marinotti Edizioni, Milano 2010).
DAVIDSON, Donald (1984), Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, Oxford University Press, Oxford (Verità e interpretazione, trad. di Brigati Roberto, Il Mulino, Bologna 1994).
DAVIDSON, Donald (1986), A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge, in LEPORE Ernest, a cura di, Truth And Interpretation. Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 307-319.
ERVAS, Francesca, GOLA, Elisabetta (2016), Che cos’è una metafora, Carocci, Roma.
FERRETTI, Francesco (1998), Pensare vedendo. Le immagini mentali nella scienza cognitiva, Carocci, Roma.
FORCEVILLE, Charles (1996), Pictorial Metaphors in Advertising, Routledge, London.
FORCEVILLE, Charles (2002), «The Identification of Target and Source in Pictorial Metaphors», in Journal of Pragmatics, 34, pp. 1-14.
FORCEVILLE, Charles (2008), Metaphor in Pictures and Multimodal Representations, in Gibbs Raimond W., a cura di, The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 463-482.
GENTILI, Augusto (2006), Elementi di retorica nella pittura religiosa veneziana del secondo Cinquecento, in DI MONTE Maria Giuseppina, a cura di, Immagine e scrittura, Meltemi, Roma, pp. 156-186.
GIBBS, Raimond W., Jr, BOGDONOVICH, Jody (1999), «Mental Imagery in Interpreting Poetic Metaphor», in Metaphor and Symbol, 14 (1), pp. 37-44.
GOMBRICH, Ernst H. (1963), Visual Metaphors of Value in Art, in id. Meditations on a Hobby Horse and Other Essays on the Theory of Art, Phaidon, London, pp. 12-29 (A cavallo di un manico di scopa: saggi di teoria dell’arte, trad. di Roatta Camilla, Einaudi, Torino 1971, pp. 20-47).
HAUSMAN, Carl R. (1989), Metaphor and Art: interactionism and reference in the verbal and nonverbal arts, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
KENNEDY, John M. (1982), «Metaphor in Pictures», in Perception, vol. 11, pp. 589-605.
KENNEDY, John M., SIMPSON, William (1982), «For Each Kind of Figure of Speech there is a Pictorial Metaphor: A Figure of Depiction», in Visual Arts Research, n. 2, pp. 1-11.
KOSSLYN, Stephen M. (1983), Ghosts in the Mind’s Machine. Creating and Using Images in the Brain, W. W. Norton and Co., New York (Le immagini nella mente. Creare ed utilizzare le immagini nel cervello, trad. di Noferi Gabriele, Giunti, Firenze 1999).
LAKOFF, George, JOHNSON, Mark (1980), Metaphors We Live By, University of Chicago Press, Chicago (Metafora e vita quotidiana, trad. di Violi Patrizia, Bompiani, Milano 1998).
MÜLLER, Cornelia (2008), Verbo-pictorial Metaphors, in id., Metaphors Dead and Alive, Sleeping and Waking: a Dynamic View, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 103-111.
NANAY, Bence (2016), Aesthetics as Philosophy of Perception, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
NOVITZ, David (1977), Pictures and their use in communication, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.
ORTONY, Andrew (1979), «Beyond Literal Similarity», in Psychological Review, vol. 86, n. 3, pp. 161-181 (trad. di Barbieri Daniele, Oltre la somiglianza letterale, in CACCIARI Cristina, a cura di, Teorie della metafora. L’acquisizione, la comprensione e l’uso del linguaggio figurato, Cortina, Milano, pp. 125-163).
PANOFSKY, Erwin (1955), Meaning in the Visual Arts. Papers in and on Art History, Doubleday Anchor Books, New York (Il significato nelle arti visive, trad. di Federici Renzo, Einaudi, Torino 2010).
RICHARDS, Ivor A. (1936), The Philosophy of Rhetoric, Oxford University Press, Oxford (La filosofia della retorica, trad. di Placido Beniamino, Feltrinelli, Milano 1967).
RUSKIN, John (1857), The Elements of Drawing, Smith, Elder & Co., London (Gli elementi del disegno, trad. di Bellone Maria Grazia, Adelphi, Milano 2009).
SONESSON, Göran (2015), «Bats Out of the Belfry: The Nature of Metaphor, with Special Attention to Pictorial Metaphors», in Signs and Media, n. 11, pp. 74-104.
SPERBER, Dan, WILSON, Deirdre (1986), Relevance. Communication and Cognition, Blackwell, Oxford (La pertinenza, trad. di Origgi Gloria, Anabasi, Milano 1993).
SORCE, Francesco (2011), Argomenti per gli occhi. La metafora visiva nelle immagini polemiche rinascimentali, in MIGLIORE Tiziana, a cura di, Retorica del visibile. Strategie dell’immagine tra significazione e comunicazione, 2 voll., Aracne, Roma, pp. 109-122.
STERN, Josef (1985), «Metaphor as Demonstrative», in The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 82, n. 12, pp. 677-710
STERN, Josef (1997), «Metaphors in Pictures», in Philosophical Topics, vol. 25, n. 1, pp. 255-293.
WOLLHEIM, Richard (1987), Painting, metaphor and the body: Titian, Bellini, De Kooning, etc., in id., Painting as an Art, Thames and Hudson, London, pp. 305-357.
WOLLHEIM, Richard (1993), Metaphor and Painting, in ANKERSMIT Frank R., MOOIJ J. J. A., a cura di, Knowledge and Language, Volume III, Springer Science, Dordrecht, pp. 113-125.
Works published in RIFL are released under Creative Commons Licence:Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.